Agriculture: Crop Insurance
Year Identified: 2013
Area Number: 19
Area Type: Cost Savings & Revenue Enhancement
◐- Partially Addressed
○- Not Addressed
◉- Consolidated or Other
⊘- Closed-Partially Addressed
⊗- Closed-Not Addressed
Last Updated:October 18, 2017
Congress may wish to consider either limiting the amount of premium subsidies that an individual farmer can receive each year—as it limits the amount of payments to individual farmers in many farm programs—or reducing premium subsidy rates, or both limiting premium subsidies and reducing premium subsidy rates.
As of September 2017, Congress had not enacted legislation to reduce premium subsidy rates or limit premium subsidies available to individual farmers, as GAO suggested in March 2012. The Senate approved farm bill legislation in June 2013 that included a provision that would have reduced premium subsidies for some farmers. Farm bill legislation approved by the House in July 2013 did not include a similar provision, although the House subsequently approved a resolution by voice vote to agree with the Senate’s provision reducing premium subsidies for some high-income farmers. However, the Agricultural Act of 2014 did not include the Senate’s provision to reduce premium subsidies. In August 2014, GAO issued another report on premium subsidies, again suggesting that Congress consider reducing the level of premium subsidies for revenue insurance policies, the most common type of crop insurance policy.
In a March 2015 report, GAO found reducing crop insurance subsidies for the highest income participants would have a minimal effect on the program and save millions of dollars. During the debate leading up to passage of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (the 2014 farm bill), various proposals were offered that would have reduced premium subsidies for crop insurance participants with incomes exceeding a certain limit. However, none were included in the final version of the 2014 farm bill. Some stakeholders expressed concern that high-income participants represent less risk than the other participants, and that they would drop out of the program if their premium subsidies were reduced, threatening the financial soundness and viability of the entire program. However, GAO determined that if Congress enacted statutory provisions to reduce premium subsidies for the highest income participants, it would most likely not affect the actuarial soundness or viability of the program because, among other things, the highest income participants do not have lower losses than the other participants. In addition, GAO found that the highest income participants accounted for only about 1 percent of the premiums annually, on average, from 2009 through 2013.
In May 2017, the President’s fiscal year 2018 budget included a proposal to limit the amount of premium subsidies that a person can receive each year. Also in May 2017, legislation was introduced in the House and Senate that included a provision that would limit the amount of premium subsidies that a person can receive each year. Without congressional action to limit or reduce crop insurance premium subsidies, opportunities may be missed for savings of up to $1.4 billion annually.